On Feb 6, 2012, at 1:10 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2012-02-06, Ralph Goers wrote: > >> As you may be aware I have been working on Log4j 2 for about 2 years >> now. It now consists of a fairly large body of code with fairly >> decent documentation. I feel it is ready to come out of my >> experimental branch and onto its own main branch where others will >> hopefully feel more inclined to participate. > > For the benefit of the log4(X != j) communities, can you give some sort > of elevator pitch for log4j 2.0? What is different? Given that the > other projects around here have followed the 1.x model, it will be good > to know what you considered good or bad of the "old" approach. > > Don't hesitate to send me to some sort of overview document, I admit I > haven't looked for one, yet.
You can find the latest documentation at http://people.apache.org/~rgoers/log4j2/ Ralph
