On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Ralph Goers <rgo...@apache.org> wrote: > Fwiw - i don't think this really needs 3 PMC +1's to pass. If it does I have > no problem providing one but I'm not really focused on 1.x.
Thats true, but I don't want to make such a move when somebody is really opposed to it... hate rollbacks in svn. As this is a code change, it can be blocked by a -1, or so I understood it. Cheers > > Ralph > > On Apr 10, 2012, at 6:46 AM, Ralph Goers <rgo...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +0.5 >> >> Ralph >> >> On Apr 10, 2012, at 2:35 AM, Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> before easter we have discussed this already. I would like to remove >>> jdk 1.3 support with the next log4j version 1.2.17. Because there are >>> so many feelings out there, I would like to call out this vote before. >>> >>> [] +1 go ahead >>> [] 0, don't care >>> [] -1 don't because... >>> >>> I'll leave it open for the usual 72 hours. After that I will update >>> the pom files. >>> >>> Cheers >>> Christian >>> >>> >>> -- >>> http://www.grobmeier.de >>> https://www.timeandbill.de >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org >>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org >>> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
