On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Antonio Petrelli <antonio.petre...@gmail.com> wrote: > 2012/6/1 Christian Grobmeier <grobme...@gmail.com>: >> Antonio, >> >> I just realized you already have created a parent pom and move the >> code into log4j-core. >> >> is it possible you provide a patch for this? I would like to apply it >> and then I could bring back the mentioned chainsaw/lf5 code, which is >> currently not in your repos. > > A patch is worthless in case of change of getting from Git, it is > better to use pulls. For a guide: > http://wiki.apache.org/general/GitAtApache
Thanks! Looks good. > Anyway, again, the job that Anthony did needs to be evaluated, because > it seems nice. And remember that Git is much better that SVN at > managing changes. Yes, fine. I missed that mail, just saw it. Anyway, in the current trunk "chainsaw" and "lf5" are missing. If you merge and see the chance, you can put them back into the trunk. I was to fast here. > Antonio > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > -- http://www.grobmeier.de https://www.timeandbill.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
