On Jul 22, 2012, at 8:28 PM, Scott Deboy wrote: > I'm not sure how much of the extras companion would be applicable to log4j2. > I assume appender and receiver-related things wouldn't change much except for > the construction of LoggingEvents? > > I can look things over, but Ralph, if you wouldn't mind, would you give > extras a once-over and point out what is redundant with features already > provided by log4j2, and what changes other than event construction would be > likely in order to support extras with log4j2? > > I'd like to support Chainsaw with log4j2 (and existing appenders and > receivers etc) and I don't yet have a sense for what that would take. >
I seem to recall going through extras and pulling several things into Log4j 2 from it. But yes, I will go through it again. I know you asked about support for Receivers and I haven't done anything with that yet. I've never looked at the Chainsaw code. Ralph --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
