On Sep 25, 2012, at 8:36 AM, Noel Grandin wrote: > > On 2012-09-25 04:50, Gary Gregory wrote: >> For SC, since you are recompiling, IMO, it is OK for a MAJOR release to be >> different and print the stack trace. >> >> It is just so nice to say debug(Throwable) and have the right thing (IMO >> again) happen. >> >> Having code say debug(throwable.toString(), throwable) is just... well lame >> :( >> > > I tend to agree. I have these same methods in my own internal logging > framework. > > Perhaps if there were convenience methods like > void fatalException(Throwable t); > void debugException(Throwable t); > void warnException(Throwable t); > void infoException(Throwable t); > ?? > > But then I like my API's to be quite wide, with lots of convenience methods > :-)
I have no problem with these methods. Maybe they will make Gary happier ;-) Ralph --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
