But even in java 5 is that the best way to find out version? Is there
no direct way? Should be a enhancement request for the laminat specs
if not.
On 11/3/12, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
> In my job no one has ever mentioned even trying Java 7. We use Java 6. So
> far it hasn't cost me much effort to support Java 5 as well as 6 and 7 so
> code like below doesn't bother me.
>
> Ralph
>
>
> On Nov 2, 2012, at 7:44 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> When I see code like this:
>>
>> protected AbstractStringLayout(Charset charset) {
>> this.charset = charset;
>> boolean useClass = false;
>> try {
>> if (String.class.getMethod("getBytes", new Class[]
>> {Charset.class}) != null) {
>> useClass = true;
>> }
>> } catch (NoSuchMethodException ex) {
>> // Not JDK 6 or greater.
>> }
>> encoder = useClass ? new ClassEncoder() : new NameEncoder();
>> }
>>
>> I wonder why we are not on Java 6.
>>
>> Do we expect people to port to Log4J2 on Java 5? Or to write new
>> application with Log4J2 on Java 5?
>>
>> At my day job, we are talking about how fast we can move to Java 7 and
>> leave 6 behind...
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> --
>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
>> JUnit in Action, 2nd Ed: http://bit.ly/ECvg0
>> Spring Batch in Action: http://bit.ly/bqpbCK
>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>
>
--
Sent from my mobile device
Regards
Tushar Kapila
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
