On Dec 20, 2012, at 5:02 PM, Scott Severtson wrote: > Ralph, > > Thanks. I knew it was something dumb, I just needed another set of eyes. > > As for the manager - it looks like AbstractManager.getManager uses a "name" > as a key, and returns shared instances if the same key is provided. Correct?
Yes, this is correct. > > I'm thinking for SMTPAppender, this may be a good place to hold identically > configured javax.mail.Session instances. Are there any existing appenders > which rely on a composite "name" key, composed of several plugin > configuration settings? Just curious where I could look for examples, as I'll > need a unique instance per protocol/host/port/username/password/debug > settings. Otherwise, I'll just concatenate settings with separators of some > kind. There are a few that rely on composite keys. The most complex is the Flume Appender. The embedded version takes a pile of properties so it ends up just creating an MD5 out of it all. JMSQueueManager does final String name = "JMSQueue:" + factoryBindingName + '.' + queueBindingName; > > Finally, Dumbster is APL 2.0, so it shouldn't be a concern. I'll build some > basic tests using it. > > I'll see what I can wrap up in the short term, for possible inclusion in beta > 4. Sounds great! Ralph --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
