[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-153?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13608984#comment-13608984
]
Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-153:
-------------------------------------
I like the names that do not have "info" like "includeLocation" or
"includeCaller" or even "includeCallSite".
A plugin sounds nice and flexible but how realistic is it that people will need
that? Can it be left a boolean and enhanced to a plugin later without breaking
compatibility? Probably not... unless the value range is extended from
"true|false" to "true|false|className" or some such.
> Async Logger/Appender performance improvement: provide mechanism to discover
> if location StackTraceElement is actually required downstream.
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-153
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-153
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Remko Popma
>
> (update 2013 Feb 4: changed summary.
> Previous title: Add a method to the Layout interface to allow Loggers to
> discover if any of their Appenders need the location StackTraceElement.)
> ----
> Use Case: any asynchronous Logger or Appender has this problem:
> should it take a snapshot of the call stack (as implemented in
> Log4jLogEvent.getSource) or not?
> This is an expensive method (1600+ nanoseconds on a machine with 2.9GHz
> cores) so you only want to call it if you need it. Currently there is no way
> to discover if the location information is used by any of the configured
> layouts.
> If the Layout interface has a method that indicates whether the layout calls
> the LogEvent.getSource method, then the Logger can query its LoggerConfig if
> any of the configured Appenders has a Layout which needs location info.
> (Maybe boolean needsLocationInfo() would be a good name?)
> With this information, a Logger can construct Log4jLogEvents with a non-null
> dummy StackTraceElement location if none of the layouts downstream need
> location info. The non-null dummy location would prevent LogEvent.getSource
> from taking a call stack snapshot.
> The current AsynchAppender class would get an immediate performance boost
> from this, and custom asynchronous Loggers or Appenders would reap the same
> benefits.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
