Makes sense to me. I'd only ask that you hold off on this until my warnings cleanup patch has been applied. I touched a LOT of files, including that one, and a merge with a rename could be more fun than I'm after.
I'll be submitting my bug/patch within the next few minutes. Nick On Apr 26, 2013, at 12:35 PM, Ralph Goers wrote: > The reason we are still beta is so changes like this can be made. I'm OK > with it. > > Ralph > > On Apr 26, 2013, at 10:18 AM, Remko Popma wrote: > >> I would like to rename AsynchAppender to AsyncAppender. >> In addition I'd like to rename the plugin name for that appender from Asynch >> to Async. >> >> Reasons for renaming: >> * consistency with Log4j-1.x and Logback naming >> * consistency with Log4j-2.0 Async Loggers naming >> * my personal preference (Asynch looks like it rhymes with inch) >> >> I'm a bit concerned about the plugin renaming as it may break existing >> configurations. >> How much of an installed base do we estimate we currently have? >> Is it possible to support both plugin names Asynch and Async? And would that >> be a good idea or not? >> >> Thoughts? >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
