I didn't follow the conversation on the Commons list. What advantage(s) does JaCoCo have over Cobertura? Is there a need to run both or could we just standardize on one of them. I believe the Cobertura plugin runs during the site build so if JaCoCo was the same I'm not sure why we would need a toggle, unless we only wanted to run a code coverage report.
Ralph On May 28, 2013, at 6:14 PM, [email protected] wrote: > Author: ggregory > Date: Wed May 29 01:14:18 2013 > New Revision: 1487179 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1487179 > Log: > Enable code coverage. A comment in the POMs used to say this was broken with > the 2.2 Cobertura plugin, but it works just fine with 2.5.2. To consider: > Should we do like Apache Commons and provide a toggle to run JaCoCo too? > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
