The only rule is that you have to rename the class fast.

On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:03 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ok. (Phew :-))
> It'd be great if you could take care of that one, thanks!
>
>  ------------------------------
> * From: * Gary Gregory <[email protected]>;
> * To: * Log4J Developers List <[email protected]>;
> * Subject: * Re: Rename FastFileAppender
> * Sent: * Mon, Jul 29, 2013 2:54:12 PM
>
>   Arg! You are correct!
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:51 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Surely you mean RandomAccessFileAppender?
>> (The Fast*Appenders have nothing to do with sync/async.)
>>
>>  ------------------------------
>> * From: * Gary Gregory <[email protected]>;
>> * To: * Log4J Developers List <[email protected]>;
>> * Subject: * Re: Rename FastFileAppender
>> * Sent: * Mon, Jul 29, 2013 2:46:23 PM
>>
>>    I think it's been long enough, I plan on renaming "Fast*" to "Async*"
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 3:54 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>wrote:
>>
>>> A JIRA is tracking the list of new candidate class names.
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Paul Benedict <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Was there any conclusion to this?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Paul Benedict 
>>>> <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Being in the dark here, is there any reason to provide a non-fast
>>>>> version? I only ask because FastDateFormat makes sense in that it is a
>>>>> replacement for a JDK counterpart. Is the FastFileAppender a replacement
>>>>> too? If not, I say why not only provide the fast one?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Remko Popma <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> It's faster than FileAppender.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/manual/async.html#FileAppender_vs._FastFileAppender
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   ------------------------------
>>>>>>  *From:* Paul Benedict <[email protected]>
>>>>>> *To:* Log4J Developers List <[email protected]>
>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, July 19, 2013 11:20 PM
>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: Rename FastFileAppender
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to know what it's faster than too. The only other "fast"
>>>>>> class is Commons Lang FastDateFormat. In their javadoc they say:
>>>>>> "FastDateFormat is a fast and thread-safe version of SimpleDateFormat." I
>>>>>> think the inference (taking a guess here) is that it's faster than
>>>>>> SimpleDateFormat.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I agree with Gary. Unless we have a comparison to something else, I
>>>>>> say the "fast" adjective is meaningless.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:26 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This came up before but recent emails reminds me that we should
>>>>>> rename FastFileAppender and related classes to better names since
>>>>>> "Fast" begs the question: Faster than what? And: Where is the
>>>>>> SlowFileAppender, and MediumSpeedFileAppender and so on, you get the 
>>>>>> idea.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think the name that floated up before is
>>>>>> RandomAccessFileAppender.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (Alternatively but not my 1st choice: RAFAppender, RafAppender.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Then both RandomAccessFileAppender and FileAppender co-exist until
>>>>>> we decide to: keep both or pick one as the true FileAppender.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second 
>>>>>> Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Paul
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Paul
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Paul
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second 
>>> Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second 
>> Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>
>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second 
> Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>



-- 
Cheers,
Paul

Reply via email to