Are we saying beta9 first, then a GA release? About outstanding issues: There's one blocker Jiras about events getting dropped when AsyncAppender are used in combination with RollingFile appender. https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-315 I'd like to get that fixed before the next beta but have trouble finding time...
There is also the request to provide configuration alternatives for the system properties (although some of these may not be technically feasible). Not sure how urgent that one is. On Tuesday, August 27, 2013, Ralph Goers wrote: > Well, I was going to ask what needs to be done to get to a GA release - > I'd prefer there not be a beta10 if it isn't required. I do think the OSGi > stuff needs to be addressed for that but I am not sure what else. From a > timing perspective I think this is about the time we were shooting for to > release so I am OK with that. > > Ralph > > On Aug 27, 2013, at 6:17 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi All > > I wonder if we should release the next beta9 now and then all focus on > OSGi the best we can. > > This would let us push out a lot of fixes and make beta10 all about OSGi. > > Thoughts? > > Gary > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second > Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > >
