Actually, it looks like both 1.9 and 2.2 versions are used in different parts of the POM... I 'm not sure why...
Gary On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 11:34 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi All: > > Can we have a comment in the main POM as to why we are using an old > version of Jackson (1.9) instead of the current version (2.x)? > > Thank you, > Gary > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second > Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
