I believe Gary meant a vote on the logo - I'm not sure how that relates to web 
configuration changes.

Ralph

> On Jan 2, 2014, at 11:36 AM, Nick Williams <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> 
> wrote:
> 
> Not yet. There are several outstanding issues regarding the web configuration 
> that need to be solved. I plan on tackling them next week. I'm finally 
> finishing my book this weekend—four months late. :-(
> 
> Nick
> 
>> On Jan 2, 2014, at 1:23 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> 
>> So, should we call for a vote?
>> 
>> Gary
>> 
>> 
>> -------- Original message --------
>> From: Paul Benedict 
>> Date:01/02/2014 11:49 (GMT-05:00) 
>> To: Log4J Developers List 
>> Subject: Re: Logo Contest 
>> 
>> I think holding up the final release for the logo shouldn't be too desired. 
>> I am patiently waiting for 2.0 to hit GA and the logo is superfluous to my 
>> usage. 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 10:13 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> There have been many candidates submitted in the Logo contest [1] which can 
>>> be viewed at http://www.fdmhosting.com/log4j2/.  I am going to be honest 
>>> and say that none of them grabs me and says “that’s the one”, although I 
>>> like the ideas expressed in quite a few of them.  I definitely like the 
>>> play on version 2 and using it as a superscript to make it appear as log4j 
>>> squared.   Many of the logos just feel too big to me - they have Log4j 
>>> adjacent to the image, making them take up a lot of horizontal space. On 
>>> the images themselves, I really like the coffee cup submitted by Murad,   I 
>>> like the script used by Andreas but I would prefer that the 4 was facing 
>>> the correct direction and that the 2 superscript be to the right of the 4 
>>> instead of to the left.  I think many of the graphics submitted by Gary are 
>>> kind of cool - they are very modern looking.
>>> 
>>> Ideally we should pick out a new logo before 2.0 is released so it would be 
>>> great if we could get more discussion on this.
>>> 
>>> Finally, these are just my opinions.  I won’t be the only one voting so I 
>>> would definitely like to hear what some of the other PMC members think.
>>> 
>>> Ralph
>>> 
>>> 
>>> [1] - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-316
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Cheers,
>> Paul
> 

Reply via email to