Actually, there is a decent chance it will be the GA release. We are waiting for feedback from Gary on what he thinks.
FWIW, there is no “Project Manager” here. We make decisions based on consensus. However, the release manager does get some latitude. Ralph On Jan 11, 2014, at 10:52 AM, Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> On Jan 11, 2014, at 4:14, Peter McCarthy <petergeraldmccar...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> I am wondering if there is a GA date decided for log4j2? >> >> Is patch 9 the last beta release, or are there many more beta loads planned >> ? > > The next release will be an RC release. > >> >> The reason I ask is we currently use log4j, however we have found that in >> our larger installations where we produce a lot of logging it is not fit for >> purpose. We want to move to log4j2 and are currently testing our large >> installations against it. However we cannot put a beta version of log4j2 >> into our own GA release (due in mid year, however we would need a large lead >> time to fully test log4j2). We need some indication as to when log4j2 will >> GA so as we can decide if we can use it or not in our own next release. >> >> Any information would be greatly appreciated on this. > > Based on current blockers and critical bugs, if you're not using OSGi, the > current code is pretty much ready for a GA release. I'd like to see an RC1 > release soon, but that's up to the PM I think. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
