I'm ok with those new levels. Scott On Jan 17, 2014 8:51 PM, "Nick Williams" <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote:
> Wanted to update y'all. As you know, I've been very absent lately due to > the book consuming every minute of my free time. I know I haven't been > contributing my due, and for that please accept my sincerest apologies. The > book is finally done (goes on sale next month!) and I can get back to > regular life. I'm going to be out of town for the next week on a > much-needed vacation with very limited access to email. I'll be back the > weekend of January 25-26, and that weekend I will be spending almost the > entire time finally dealing with the 8-10 web application-related bugs. > After that, I don't see any encumbrances to releasing 2.0.0.GA. > > Except... > > Logging Levels. We kinda-sorta talked about this a few months ago, and a > few months before that, and a few months before that, but we never actually > DID anything about it. It's clear by now that my "extendable enum" proposal > (that would be a drop-in replacement for and binary compatible with the > current Level enum) is not going to be accepted. Absent any other > proposals, I suggest we add the following new levels before GA: > > CONFIG - Between INFO and WARN, mapped to INFO for bridges to other > frameworks that don't have an equivalent level > > FINE - Between DEBUG and TRACE, mapped to TRACE for bridges to other > frameworks that don't have an equivalent level > > I'll let y'all chat about that over the next week. ;-) > > Be back soon, > > Nick > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > >
