I am. Today, in fact.

N

On Jan 26, 2014, at 3:43 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:

> Nick, Are you working on this?
> 
> Ralph
> 
> On Jan 18, 2014, at 11:38 AM, Nicholas Williams 
> <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> wrote:
> 
>> Yes. Next weekend I plan on adding a Servlet context parameter that allows 
>> the user to disable starting Log4j automatically. That should allow us to 
>> keep everything in one JAR while supporting both sides of the argument. 
>> 
>> Nick
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone, so please forgive brief replies and frequent typos
>> 
>> On Jan 18, 2014, at 10:54, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>> I’ve always had reservations about the servlet 3.0 automatic configuration 
>>> because if the log4j jar is present it can’t be disabled or be modified by 
>>> the end user. We’ve had some issues with Spring initialization and now 
>>> LOG4J2-452 reinforces that.  I would propose that if we want to keep it 
>>> that we move the minimum amount required into its own jar so that users 
>>> have a choice as to whether it is automatically initialized.
>>> 
>>> Am I the only one who feels this way?  Frankly, this and one other issue I 
>>> plan to work on this weekend are the only things I see as blockers for a GA 
>>> release.
>>> 
>>> For me, the fewer jars, the better. Can't this be configured somehow 
>>> without having to do more jar juggling?
>>> 
>>> Gary
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Ralph
>>> 
>>> On Jan 17, 2014, at 8:25 PM, Nick Williams <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Filter initialization is one of the last things to happen in web app 
>>>> startup. The ServletContainerInitializer sets the threads logger context 
>>>> so that web app startup procedures can use it. The filter's init() method 
>>>> clears it near the end of startup so that it doesn't bleed into another 
>>>> web app.
>>>> 
>>>> Then, on web apps shutdown, destruction of filters is one of the first 
>>>> things to happen. The filter's destroy() sets the logger context so that 
>>>> the web app shutdown procedures can use it.
>>>> 
>>>> Nick
>>>> 
>>>> On Jan 17, 2014, at 10:17 PM, Matt Sicker wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Now I'm not sure if I'm interpreting this correctly, but init() clears 
>>>>> the current thread's logger context, and destroy() sets it. What's up 
>>>>> with this? Especially since it just gets set and cleared in the 
>>>>> doFilter() bit.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org 
>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
>>> Spring Batch in Action
>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com 
>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> 

Reply via email to