I would appreciate if there wasn't even a threat of veto.
I would like to see folks ask questions and talk about concerns, and then
only mention a veto when there is no other recourse.
On Feb 7, 2014 8:14 AM, "Nick Williams" <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net>
wrote:
> Yep. I would've accompanied any veto with technical justification. Since I
> can't come up with a technical justification for renaming it to couchbase,
> I won't veto it. :-)
>
> N
>
> On Feb 7, 2014, at 10:09 AM, Scott Deboy wrote:
>
> I do want to remind everyone that vetoes are only valid if they are backed
> by a technical justification.
>
> Scott
> On Feb 7, 2014 8:07 AM, "Nick Williams" <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm not convinced it really makes a difference, but it's better than
>> couchdb, so if the majority wants couchbase it I won't veto it. Be sure to
>> change the test package name, too.
>>
>> Nick
>>
>> On Feb 7, 2014, at 10:03 AM, Scott Deboy wrote:
>>
>> +1 to couchbase
>> On Feb 7, 2014 7:54 AM, "Christian Grobmeier" <grobme...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 7 Feb 2014, at 16:19, Nick Williams wrote:
>>>
>>> It doesn't so much matter because the XML element names are case
>>>> insensitive, but if we change the plugin name for CouchDB we should
>>>> probably also change it for MongoDB. There's a reason I did that, I just
>>>> can't remember what it was...
>>>>
>>>> I don't see any compelling reason to rename the package. The package
>>>> name for MongoDB is "mongo." I don't like combining multiple words into a
>>>> single package name segment, because we can't camel case them (bad practice
>>>> to have cap letters in package names). Show me another NoSQL database with
>>>> the word "couch" in it and I'll reconsider. :-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> couchbase maybe?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> N
>>>>
>>>> On Feb 7, 2014, at 9:12 AM, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>>>
>>>> also the packagename is just "couch", but it should better be
>>>>> "couchdb".
>>>>> The name couch is misleading imho
>>>>>
>>>>> On 7 Feb 2014, at 16:11, Christian Grobmeier wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> one minor thing in ClouchDBProvider:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> * The Apache CouchDB implementation of {@link NoSQLProvider}.
>>>>>> */
>>>>>> @Plugin(name = "CouchDb", category = "Core", printObject = true)
>>>>>> public final class CouchDBProvider
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The name of this plugin is "CouchDb" while the correct name of the
>>>>>> product
>>>>>> is CouchDB: couchdb.apache.org
>>>>>> Also our class and the comments do use the correct name. Just the
>>>>>> plugin
>>>>>> name is lower case.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Any objections if I would change the plugin name to CouchDB instead
>>>>>> of CouchDb?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>>>>> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL
>>>>> @grobmeier
>>>>> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> http://www.grobmeier.de
>>> The Zen Programmer: http://bit.ly/12lC6DL
>>> @grobmeier
>>> GPG: 0xA5CC90DB
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>
