I'd like to see it fixed but it should not delay 2.O-rc1. Gary
-------- Original message -------- From: Nick Williams <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> Date:02/08/2014 23:31 (GMT-05:00) To: Log4J Developers List <log4j-dev@logging.apache.org> Subject: [CANCELED][VOTE] Log4j 2.0-rc1 rc1 Well, unfortunately my first release attempt didn't turn out so well. The vote for Log4j 2.0-rc1 RC1 has been canceled: - There are unsupported licenses. I will fix those shortly. - There might be something pointing to rc2 instead of rc1. I'll look into that. Gary also pointed out LOG4J2-531, reported within the last 24 hours. I don't think this is a show-stopper to rc1. We can roll rc2 soon, but it has been months since a release and I don't want to hold this up. Is anyone going to object to a release without a fix for LOG4J2-531? Nick --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
