Ralph always put them at the top and I've been following his convention. (No scrolling = more convenient too :-) ). I thought everyone put them at the top?
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:55 PM, Nick Williams <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net > wrote: > In changes.xml, I see some committers put changes at the top of a > <release> and others put changes at the bottom of a <release>. Which is the > best practice? > > Nick > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org > >
