Ahh. The class was originally abstract, hence why the methods were final. I see 
now why that's not needed. My bad.

N

On Feb 9, 2014, at 12:34 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 1:22 AM, Nick Williams <nicho...@nicholaswilliams.net> 
> wrote:
> Gary,
> 
> One of your commits tonight changed all of the methods in Level from being 
> final to being non-final.
> 
> Uh, the class is final, hence all the method are final...
> 
> Gary
>  
> This is not what we agreed upon. Why did you make this change? Was this one 
> of the auto-refactor changes? I've noticed a lot of cleanup tonight that 
> smells like that. :-)
> 
> Nick
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org 
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
> Spring Batch in Action
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com 
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to