-1 This is still wrong. The tag should be in the format VERSION-RC#. In this case 2.0-rc1-rc2 (VERSION=2.0-rc1 and RC#=rc2). That's what we VOTE on, the tag 2.0-rc1-rc#.
We are voting to release 2.0-rc1. The first try, 2.0-rc1-rc1, failed; now we're on to the second: 2.0-rc1-rc2. There must be a record of the code for the first attempt as an SVN tag, which I see in SVN, good. There currently is a 2.0-rc1 tag in SVN which should NOT exist until after the VOTE for a given RC passes. Gary ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <nickwilli...@apache.org> Date: Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:03 PM Subject: svn commit: r1566354 - /logging/log4j/log4j2/tags/log4j-2.0-rc1/ To: comm...@logging.apache.org Author: nickwilliams Date: Sun Feb 9 19:03:23 2014 New Revision: 1566354 URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1566354 Log: [maven-release-plugin] copy for tag log4j-2.0-rc1 Added: logging/log4j/log4j2/tags/log4j-2.0-rc1/ - copied from r1566353, logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/ -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
