Then what's with this? http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/log4j-flume-ng/index.html
On 13 March 2014 15:55, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: > Why do you say that? I never had a problem that the BOM would help. You > should only need the api, core and flume appender. As for the Appender’s > dependencies, that is fun because there are 3 flavors so a bunch of its > dependencies are optional. > > Ralph > > > > On Mar 13, 2014, at 1:36 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think the BOM module might be more useful for the Flume appender. I'm > playing with that right now, and my dependencies section is already > ridiculous without adding anything else. > > > On 13 March 2014 15:32, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> So, do we really need the BOM module? >> >> It seems superfluous. >> >> Gary >> >> -- >> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second >> Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> > > > > -- > Matt Sicker <[email protected]> > > > -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
