[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-547?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bruce Brouwer updated LOG4J2-547:
---------------------------------
Attachment: MyBenchmark.java
I took a stab at JMH. When I pulled out the code that actually takes the stack
trace (using a pre-generated stack trace) and left only the iterating code, it
shows the current code to be *much* faster. However, when you throw in the
generation of the stack trace, it looks like it becomes inconsequential. Here
are the results for a stack trace that is 200 entries deep.
{code}
Benchmark Mode Samples Mean Mean error Units
o.s.MyBenchmark.bottomUp thrpt 200 6.923 0.036 ops/ms
o.s.MyBenchmark.topDown thrpt 200 6.913 0.034 ops/ms
{code}
I've attached the benchmark code, too as {{MyBenchmark.java}}. This could be
skewed somewhat as part of this time is spent making a recursive call of 208
methods deep just to make the call to build the stack trace, but I wasn't
coming up with a better way to generate the stack trace and have it be part of
the benchmark results.
> Update LoggerStream API
> -----------------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-547
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-547
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: API
> Affects Versions: 2.0-rc1
> Reporter: Matt Sicker
> Assignee: Ralph Goers
> Fix For: 2.0-rc2
>
> Attachments: 0001-PrintStream-API-update.patch, MyBenchmark.java,
> PerfTestCalcLocation.java, log4j2-547-bbrouwer.patch,
> log4j2-loggerStream.patch
>
>
> I've got some ideas on how to improve the LoggerStream idea that I added a
> little while ago. The main thing I'd like to do is extract an interface from
> it, rename the default implementation to SimpleLoggerStream (part of the
> SimpleLogger stuff), and allow log4j implementations to specify a different
> implementation if desired.
> In doing this, I'm not sure where specifically I'd prefer the getStream
> methods to be. Right now, it's in Logger, but really, it could be in
> LoggerContext instead. I don't think I should be required to get a Logger
> just to get a LoggerStream.
> Now if only the java.io package used interfaces instead of classes. This
> would be so much easier to design!
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
