On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>wrote:

> This looks fine to me.  There is some leakage that needs to happen.  The
> intLevel() method returns the int value and that is used by Logger in core
> to make the level evaluation as fast as possible.
>

Thank you for the review. Committed to SVN.

So should the following have int equivalents?

isLessSpecificThan(Level)
isMoreSpecificThan(Level)

Gary.


> Ralph
>
> On Mar 25, 2014, at 7:51 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Please see {{log4j2-579.diff}} for a proposed new API set (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12636707/log4j2-579.diff
> ).
>
> I removed the int APIs since it feels like it is leaking encapsulation:
> the user should not care that ints are used internally.
>
> Thank you
> Gary
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I'd like to review all this again tomorrow with Ralph's comments in mind.
>> If methods are removed we just need to update the migration guide.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> -------- Original message --------
>> From: Remko Popma
>> Date:03/24/2014 21:05 (GMT-05:00)
>> To: Log4J Developers List
>> Subject: Re: Level.isGreaterOrEqual: svn commit: r1581082 -
>> /logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/Level.java
>>
>>
>> Thanks for the clarification.
>>
>> Just took a quick look. Level now has methods isGreaterOrEqual and
>> isLessOrEqual, and they are both implemented as
>>   return this.intLevel <= level.intLevel;
>>
>> That looks strange.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 2014/03/25, at 9:00, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>
>> Gary just added it.  As I stated earlier, I am not really in favor of it
>> and would prefer that it and isLessOrEqual both be removed leaving only
>> isAtLeastAsSpecificAs, which is the Log4j 2 equivalent of isGreaterOrEqual
>> in Log4j 1.
>>
>>
>> On Mar 24, 2014, at 4:47 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I may have lost track with the many commits recently, but is
>> Level.isGreaterOrEqual a newly added method? If it was a previously
>> existing method in log4j2 then is it really a good idea to reverse the
>> meaning?
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 2014/03/25, at 6:49, ggreg...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>> Author: ggregory
>> Date: Mon Mar 24 21:49:15 2014
>> New Revision: 1581082
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1581082
>> Log:
>> Fix level comparisons, version 1 and 2 are opposites in usage of internal
>> level ints!
>>
>> Modified:
>>
>>    
>> logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/Level.java
>>
>> Modified:
>> logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/Level.java
>> URL:
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/Level.java?rev=1581082&r1=1581081&r2=1581082&view=diff
>>
>> ==============================================================================
>> ---
>> logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/Level.java
>> (original)
>> +++
>> logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/log4j-api/src/main/java/org/apache/logging/log4j/Level.java
>> Mon Mar 24 21:49:15 2014
>> @@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ public final class Level implements Comp
>>      * @return True if the given Level is less specific or the same than
>> this Level.
>>      */
>>     public boolean isGreaterOrEqual(final int level) {
>> -        return this.intLevel >= level;
>> +        return this.intLevel <= level;
>>     }
>>
>>     /**
>> @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ public final class Level implements Comp
>>       * @return True if the given Level is less specific or the same than
>> this Level.
>>      */
>>     public boolean isGreaterOrEqual(final Level level) {
>> -        return this.intLevel >= level.intLevel;
>> +        return this.intLevel <= level.intLevel;
>>     }
>>
>>     /**
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second 
> Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>
>
>


-- 
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to