Matt Sicker created LOG4J2-602: ---------------------------------- Summary: Several unit tests are too spammy in the build log Key: LOG4J2-602 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-602 Project: Log4j 2 Issue Type: Bug Components: Core Affects Versions: 2.0-rc1 Reporter: Matt Sicker
When I build the project using {{maven clean install}}, I get a ton of irrelevant information about various tests. There are a few tests that intentionally throw an exception (e.g., for testing the FailoverAppender) with messages like "always fail" or "test". Now as a human, I can tell that those tests work as expected. However, as a robot, I wouldn't be able to tell the difference between test exception stack traces and actual problems with the tests. In fact, some CI systems will consider such error output to be a build problem and won't mark the build as successful. See, for instance, [my attempted build on travis-ci.org|https://travis-ci.org/jvz/logging-log4j2/jobs/22911866]. These debug messages, while useful in development, really ought to be a build profile setting (however that would be done in Maven; or if there's a way to mix in the string lookup plugins with a maven property). I'm actually wondering if all the exception stack traces there are even expected. If they are, couldn't we use @Test(expected = SQLException.class) or whatever the syntax is? -- This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA (v6.2#6252) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org