[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13995115#comment-13995115
 ] 

Mikael Ståldal commented on LOG4J2-623:
---------------------------------------

Can you give a concrete example of what the JSON will look like?

It is not sufficient to say that it will be "equivalent" to the XML format, 
since JSON and XML are structurally different.


> Better structure of Thread Context Map in JSONLayout
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-623
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-623
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Layouts
>    Affects Versions: 2.0-rc1
>            Reporter: Mikael Ståldal
>            Assignee: Ralph Goers
>            Priority: Minor
>
> Currently, the Thread Context Map looks like this in JSONLayout:
> {code:JavaScript|title=Current}
>  "Properties":[
>       {
>         "name":"UserName",
>         "value":"admin"
>       },
>       {
>         "name":"OrgName",
>         "value":"test"
>       } 
>     ] 
> {code}
> This does not properly make use of the JSON data format. Since the Thread 
> Context Map is a map, it should be represented as a JSON object. And why not 
> name it "mdc" rather than the quite vauge "Properties"?
> {code:JavaScript|title=Suggested}
>   "mdc": {
>     "UserName":"admin", 
>     "OrgName":"test"
>   }
> {code}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org

Reply via email to