[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-623?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13999223#comment-13999223
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-623:
------------------------------------
While I agree in principal, what is awkward about that is that while the
JSONConfiguration and JSONLayout both require Jackson, the XMLConfiguration
does not while XMLLayout now also requires Jackson, so the separate module
would contain JSONConfiguration, JSONLayout and XMLLayout, which seems a bit
odd to include in a log4j-json jar.
> Better structure of Thread Context Map in JSONLayout
> ----------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-623
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-623
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Layouts
> Affects Versions: 2.0-rc1
> Reporter: Mikael Ståldal
> Assignee: Ralph Goers
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.0-rc2
>
>
> Currently, the Thread Context Map looks like this in JSONLayout:
> {code:JavaScript|title=Current}
> "Properties":[
> {
> "name":"UserName",
> "value":"admin"
> },
> {
> "name":"OrgName",
> "value":"test"
> }
> ]
> {code}
> This does not properly make use of the JSON data format. Since the Thread
> Context Map is a map, it should be represented as a JSON object. And why not
> name it "mdc" rather than the quite vauge "Properties"?
> {code:JavaScript|title=Suggested}
> "mdc": {
> "UserName":"admin",
> "OrgName":"test"
> }
> {code}
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
