OK, so I will plan on doing a commit with these new settings unless someone
else chimes in soon. Let's say by tomorrow AM (I am US EST).

Gary


On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:38 PM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>wrote:

> +1
>
> Ralph
>
> On May 19, 2014, at 3:39 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> So, do we have consensus now?
>
> * Wildcarts are allowed in static imports, only for junit.Assert, EasyMock
> and hamcrest.CoreMatchers.
> * Static imports come after normal imports
> * imports are sorted java > javax > com > org
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Just those 3 is fine with me.
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 2014/05/19, at 9:49, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>
>> I would say only for the 3 Gary listed below.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>> On May 18, 2014, at 5:36 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks! I'll try those settings.
>>
>> Do we have consensus that wildcarts can be used (only) for static imports?
>>
>> Remko
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 2014/05/19, at 7:38, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> You can say this in Eclipse:
>>
>> #Organize Import Order
>> #Sun May 18 17:18:10 EDT 2014
>> 6=com
>> 5=org
>> 4=javax
>> 3=java
>> 2=\#org.junit.Assert
>> 1=\#org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers
>> 0=\#org.easymock.EasyMock
>>
>> Where 0 is at the top and 6 at the bottom.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Eclipse will group all static imports together at the top of the import
>>> list. Not sure if this is configurable.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 5:46 AM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> So do static imports ALL come before normal imports or are they
>>>> together with imports for their group (org, com, and so on)?
>>>>
>>>> IOW:
>>>>
>>>> Like this:
>>>>
>>>> import static org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull;
>>>> import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
>>>>
>>>> import java.util.List;
>>>> import java.util.Map;
>>>>
>>>> import org.apache.logging.log4j.LogManager;
>>>> import org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger;
>>>> import org.apache.logging.log4j.LoggingException;
>>>>
>>>> or like that:
>>>>
>>>> import java.util.List;
>>>> import java.util.Map;
>>>>
>>>> import static org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull;
>>>> import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
>>>>
>>>> import org.apache.logging.log4j.LogManager;
>>>> import org.apache.logging.log4j.Logger;
>>>> import org.apache.logging.log4j.LoggingException;
>>>>
>>>> Gary
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 5:15 AM, Remko Popma <remko.po...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Regarding static imports, I propose that we:
>>>>> 1) only use them in test classes
>>>>> 2) always use wildcard static imports
>>>>>
>>>>> That would match our current usage almost perfectly. We now have a
>>>>> total of 431 static imports in the project.
>>>>>
>>>>> // NON-TEST class: remove static import & use qualified name here?
>>>>> PluginProcessor:
>>>>> 41: import static javax.tools.Diagnostic.Kind.ERROR;
>>>>> 42: import static javax.tools.StandardLocation.CLASS_OUTPUT;
>>>>>
>>>>> // all other static imports are in test classes:
>>>>>
>>>>> org.junit.Assert.*
>>>>> org.hamcrest.CoreMatchers.* // fluent interface would no longer be
>>>>> fluent without static imports
>>>>> org.easymock.EasyMock.* // similar to org.junit.Assert.* IMHO
>>>>>
>>>>> in LevelTest:
>>>>> import static org.apache.logging.log4j.Level.*; // I would keep this
>>>>> static import:
>>>>> The test wants to do things like "Level[] levels = new Level[] {
>>>>> TRACE, DEBUG, INFO, WARN, ERROR, FATAL };"
>>>>> this is short and clean. I don't see a need to remove the static
>>>>> import, especially in the context of this being a test class for Levels.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Ralph Goers <
>>>>> ralph.go...@dslextreme.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is what I have in Intellij - http://imgur.com/wU4Y3wO. I agree
>>>>>> with Remko that we should make an exception for org.junit.Assert.*
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ralph
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On May 16, 2014, at 2:53 PM, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I import most general (java, javax) to most specific (com) with org
>>>>>> in between. I think this is the eclipse default.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I want guidelines that eclipse can sort automatically.  This way
>>>>>> there is no time wasting with manual fiddling.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -------- Original message --------
>>>>>> From: Paul Benedict
>>>>>> Date:05/16/2014 15:12 (GMT-05:00)
>>>>>> To: Log4J Developers List
>>>>>> Subject: Re: [proposal] import guidelines
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'd like to throw out something I've grown fond of, which is making
>>>>>> one's home project the top import priority. For you guys, it would be
>>>>>> "org.apache.logging.log4j". What I like so much about this choice is that
>>>>>> it makes eye-balling the use of your own classes very apparent.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Paul
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Paul
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Gary Gregory <
>>>>>> garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I propose we use the following guidelines for import statements:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/logging/log4j/log4j2/trunk/src/ide/eclipse/4.3.2/organize-imports.importorder
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> which in Eclipse looks like this:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://i.imgur.com/04C84XY.png
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Note that default settings are not reflected in the .importorder
>>>>>>> file.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Gary
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
>>>>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second 
>>>>>>> Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>>>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>>>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>>>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>>>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
>>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second 
>>>> Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second 
>> Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>
>>
>>
>
>


-- 
E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to