[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-653?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14008678#comment-14008678
]
Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-653:
------------------------------------
I am more interested in what the impact is to the AbstractConfiguration code
that used to call the factory method. Doesn't this actually make that more
complicated?
> Add plugin builder classes as alternative to factory methods.
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-653
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-653
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Core
> Reporter: Matt Sicker
> Assignee: Matt Sicker
> Labels: config
>
> It would be useful to have builder-style classes as an alternative to plugin
> factory methods. This would be useful in two settings:
> # Easier to construct plugins in tests and in the code.
> # Can add annotations to fields for value injection in the PluginBuilder
> class.
> This could replace the existing factory methods, or it could complement it.
> This would also make it easier to support programmatic configuration.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
