No objections to supporting only maven 3. Sent from my iPhone
> On 2014/06/27, at 7:47, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > > +1 to Maven 3 only. I do not see the point in jumping through hoops on this > one. > > Gary > > >> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> LOG4J2-692 reports that the build fails due to the new support for the Maven >> shade plugin. Frankly I haven’t used Maven 2 in years and I’m not sure why >> we list it as supported. I would propose fixing this with a doc change to >> say we require Maven 3. >> >> Any objections? >> >> Ralph >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > JUnit in Action, Second Edition > Spring Batch in Action > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
