I finished the manual page on Custom Log Levels and Custom Loggers and
committed to trunk.
Please take a look. Feedback is welcome!


On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 1:52 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks!
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 1:32 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I have added 2.0.1 to Jira.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>> On Jul 16, 2014, at 8:43 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> Sounds good. I'll hold off on the Binary Logging
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-506>, Memory-Mapped
>> Appender <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-431> and config
>> improvements to replace system properties
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-321> that I would like to
>> see in a 2.1 release.
>>
>> I will try to finish the manual page for Custom/Extended Loggers
>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-710> in time for the 2.0.1
>> release.
>>
>> Ralph, can you create a 2.0.1 release in Jira (and mark 2.0 as released)?
>> Several issues were fixed after the 2.0 vote started that now have 2.1 as
>> their fix version.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 12:32 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> I agree.
>>>
>>> I think we should take the approach that the next version will be a
>>> patch release, not a minor version and only change to a minor version if
>>> required.  IOW, the current pom.xml files should all specify 2.0.1-SNAPSHOT
>>> as the version instead of 2.1-SNAPSHOT.  This isn’t a big deal as it can be
>>> fixed during the release but it would be nice if the SNAPSHOT version
>>> always reflected what the next release is actually going to be.
>>>
>>> Ralph
>>>
>>> On Jul 16, 2014, at 8:14 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Now that 2.0 is done, I think it would be nice to see a 2.0.1 as soon as
>>> we resolve the last of the Android issue from the current batch.
>>>
>>> We can advertise 2.0.1 as the "Android" release which also include
>>> whatever tidbits (better status logger) have made it into trunk.
>>>
>>> I suggest this now while Ralph still has his RM hat on and we have a
>>> user that has been quite helpful on testing Android patches. And we are
>>> also all till in the releasing mindset and are paying attention. For 2.1,
>>> we can take a breath, and regroup.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> Gary
>>>
>>> --
>>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to