The XML classes we use are from Jackson not JAXB, so does it matter that compact 1 does not include XML?
Gary <div>-------- Original message --------</div><div>From: Matt Sicker <[email protected]> </div><div>Date:07/22/2014 17:37 (GMT-05:00) </div><div>To: Log4J Developers List <[email protected]> </div><div>Subject: Should log4j-core be runnable using only the compact2 JDK1.8 profile? </div><div> </div>The compact2 profile leaves out a bunch of packages the JDK would normally include. I think it's even a subset of the Android classes available. Making it so log4j-core runs with just the compact2 profile would really mean it's all core, but I'm not sure which compact profile would be best to target. Things like JNDI, JDBC, Swing, AWT, etc., aren't included in the compact2 profile. I would have suggested compact1, but that doesn't even include any XML classes, so that's not really viable. -- Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
