[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-745?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14075862#comment-14075862
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-745:
------------------------------------
Aren't we over complicating things here?
If a custom plugin tries to override a conversion pattern already defined by
log4j, then log4j should just say "sorry Dave, I can't let you do that". (Nice
error message that would be, btw.)
No need for any complex mechanics to figure out who was first and who
eventually gets activated. Custom plugins should just use a unique conversion
pattern or be ignored with a warning.
Thoughts?
> Plugins can cause ConverterKeys collisions with unpredictable results
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-745
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-745
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Scott Harrington
> Assignee: Matt Sicker
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: LinkedHashMap_and_locks.patch
>
>
> If I create a Converter plugin with ConverterKeys of "d" or "m" then there
> will be a collision with the built-in DatePatternConverter or
> MessagePatternConverter.
> It is unpredictable which plugin gets used.
> I see two resolutions:
> (1) detect collisions in PatternParser and emit a warning so we know which
> implementation will be used
> (2) use whichever Log4j2Plugins.dat appeared first in the CLASSPATH
> Predictable iteration order is usually accomplished by replacing HashMaps
> with LinkedHashMaps. Could easily do this for thie PluginManager.plugins
> field. But PluginRegistry uses a ConcurrentHashMap.
> Is there a good reason to use ConcurrentHashMaps in PluginRegistry? It
> doesn't really give you any concurrency -- a caller to
> PluginManager.getPlugins could see a partially-loaded map if collectPlugins
> was still running. Why not synchronize collectPlugins and/or loadPlugins, and
> force any concurrent caller to getPlugins to wait until the loading was
> complete.
> I would give it a stab but I see other more important changes are probably
> underway for LOG4J2-741 and LOG4J2-673 and this can probably wait.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
