[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-722?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
 ]

Remko Popma reassigned LOG4J2-722:
----------------------------------

    Assignee: Remko Popma

> Commons Logging API classes missing from distribution
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-722
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-722
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.0
>            Reporter: Holger Stenzhorn
>            Assignee: Remko Popma
>
> The page [Commons Logging 
> Bridge|http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/log4j-jcl/index.html] mentions 
> under *Usage* that... 
> bq. Simply add the bridge jar along with the other Log4j 2 jars and all 
> logging done using the Commons Logging API will be routed to Log4j.
> ...and under *Requirements* only that...
> bq. The Commons Logging Bridge requires at least Java 6 and is dependent on 
> the Log4j 2 API.
> But this is actually not the case since the API classes from the package 
> {{org.apache.commons.logging}} are not bundled within the bridge JAR.
> So currently the name {{log4j-jcl-2.0.jar}} is a misnomer and so the solution 
> would be to either...
> * rename {{log4j-jcl-2.0.jar}} to {{log4j-jcl-impl-2.0.jar}} (following the 
> example of {{log4j-slf4j-impl-2.0.jar}}) and distribute the 
> {{commons-logging-api-1.x.jar}} along with the Log4J2 distribution (perhaps 
> as log4j-jcl-api-2.0.jar)
> * package the necessary Commons Logging API classes directly into the 
> {{log4j-jcl-2.0.jar}}
> The second solution is how SLF4J handles things, how the description page 
> above describes things and how the SLF4J binding/bridge is supposed to work 
> (see LOG4J2-723)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org

Reply via email to