[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-778?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14099506#comment-14099506
]
Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-778:
-------------------------------------
"log4j2 because of the reason that log4j main author recommends logback not
log4j2."
You have to ask yourself what motivates such comments. If you were a log4j1
author (but not log4j2) and also created logback and owned a company selling
logback support/services, which project would you recommend?
> logback better than log4j2 as per log4j author
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-778
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-778
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: Question
> Reporter: SIBISH BASHEER
> Labels: log4j, logback
>
> Hi log4j2 Team,
> If you remember, i had developed a custom logger for splunk based on log4j2
> with the log4j2 team's help and had presented to my architects. Unfortunately
> the decision from the architects was not to use log4j2 because of the reason
> that log4j main author recommends logback not log4j2.
> Have you heard of any such statements and if there is any scenario where
> logback is better than log4j2?
> Thanks
> Sibish
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
