Based on what I saw before I disagree. If we can get something relatively 
simple I might change my mind, but what we previously had was way too 
complicated to have in core.

Ralph

On Aug 29, 2014, at 3:33 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:

> Matt,
> 
> Thank you for looking into this as well. I'm debugging some tests...
> 
> I think this streaming code should be in core, not in a new module.
> 
> Gary
> 
> 
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> I still have a patch that has the work Bruce and I did with that. We have a 
> log4j-streams module for that. It's also in a branch somewhere, but I've had 
> to convert it into a patch due to divergence from the trunk. I'll make a new 
> git branch or something later tonight.
> 
> 
> On 29 August 2014 12:36, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> In am now developing some fancy JDBC proprietary do-hicky at work.
> 
> In JDBC, you log to a java.io.PrintWriter like this:
> 
> // for all drivers
> DriverManager.setLogWriter(printWriter);
> 
> // for a specific driver (if that driver support it).
> dataSource.setLogWriter(printWriter);
> 
> I want logging to go to Log4j 2. Granted, I've got no control with levels but 
> at least I could give it a (single) level (see below) and, as usual, if I 
> want the target to be the console or a file and do rollovers and such.
> 
> I could see wrapping a PW and then giving that to JDBC and Log4j somehow:
> 
> log4jPw = new Log4jPrintWriter(logger, Level.DEBUG);
> 
> ... someLog4jObject.addEventSource(log4jPw);
> 
> DriverManager.setLogWriter(log4jPw);
> // or
> dataSource.setLogWriter(log4jPw);
> 
> The PW would buffer until it gets a println() or the buffer reaches some size 
> limit, then turns its buffer into log event.
> 
> Also, JDBC 4.1 in Java 7 has some integration with JUL with 
> javax.sql.CommonDataSource.getParentLogger() but each driver has to support 
> that.
> 
> My requirements look like a perfect match with log4j2-547 and it looks like 
> Bruce put a lot of work in there.
> 
> So I am going to experiment to bring that code base in.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Gary
> 
> -- 
> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] 
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
> Spring Batch in Action
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com 
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] 
> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
> JUnit in Action, Second Edition
> Spring Batch in Action
> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com 
> Home: http://garygregory.com/
> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to