OK - I ask because it was previously suggested that it just become integrated with the API. As I said, making it a separate module right now should make it easier to decide whether that is a good idea or not.
Ralph On Sep 2, 2014, at 9:13 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > Ralph, > > Matt merged the code into master this weekend (the new module log4j-streams) > and I've hacking on it there. > > Right now, it's 13 classes (which could be 14 with another refactoring) and > the jar is 34,588 bytes. > > The 2.1-SNAPSHOT API jar is 124,401 bytes. > > It looks like the solution is fairly complete WRT covering many of streams > and writers. > > The original author should really opine on completeness though. > > Gary > > > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> > wrote: > Gary, > > How many classes is it and how much of an impact would it have on the API if > it was merged there? Can you provide a link to to the branch again? > > Ralph > > On Sep 2, 2014, at 7:31 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hi All: >> >> This is a vague plan proposal for the new log4-streams module: >> >> - Clean up ALL of the current log4-streams code, add features, tweak >> features, remove features, bang it, tap it, test it. I do not know what is >> in progress in all of the classes/tests. Matt? Bruce? >> - Once the code is all good, which it seems to be ATM, the patch was >> excellent, discuss how much of it we want to release for 2.1. >> -- all of it, not a burden due to size since it is a new module >> -- only was is needed to support PrintWriter and PrintStream, which is the >> minimum IMO. >> -- something in the middle: please outline. >> -- Document it. >> >> In a perfect world, I would hope we could settle this in one, two or three >> weeks or so, and then document and release 2.1 in keeping with RERO if Matt >> is still willing and able to RM. >> >> Matt has mentioned in a separate thread considering a 2.0.3 release which, >> if he goes through with, should probably not include the new streaming >> module. I would prefer we concentrate on 2.1 instead of a 2.0.3 but I am >> biased since I do not have bugs in 2.0.2 that need fixing ASAP. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> Thank you, >> Gary >> >> -- >> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition >> Spring Batch in Action >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > > > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > JUnit in Action, Second Edition > Spring Batch in Action > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
