Ah, ok. Thanks for the clarification. 

Sent from my iPhone

> On 2014/09/17, at 12:03, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Sorry, not a graph but a table. One column with the features and the other 
> with their dependencies.
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
>> On Sep 16, 2014, at 7:44 PM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>> I'll create a Jira to add a page with runtime dependencies to the site. We 
>> have one (core component index page) but it's kind if hidden and Ralph 
>> mentioned he wanted a link from the left nav menu. He also mentioned a graph 
>> but I have trouble picturing what he has in mind. 
>> 
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>>> On 2014/09/17, at 10:34, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> We'd certainly like to improve this in the documentation and have been 
>>> discussing it recently. I made sure to add a bunch of comments (which 
>>> inspired others to do the same afterward) to the pom file to note what each 
>>> dependency was used for.
>>> 
>>>> On 16 September 2014 02:39, Mikael Ståldal 
>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> log4j-core has quite some Maven dependencies declared with 
>>>> <optional>true</optional>. E.g. Jackson.
>>>> 
>>>> Is that really wise? I see a risk that users of Log4j is not aware if this 
>>>> and will get ClassNotFoundException:s at runtime.
>>>> 
>>>> http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-optional-and-excludes-dependencies.html
>>>> 
>>>> -- 
>>>> Mikael Ståldal
>>>> Chief Software Architect
>>>> Appear
>>>> Phone: +46 8 545 91 572
>>>> Email: [email protected]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>

Reply via email to