[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-978?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14368677#comment-14368677
]
Remko Popma commented on LOG4J2-978:
------------------------------------
Ralph, can you answer Daniel's question on supporting an optional millisec
precision timestamp?
Daniel, about configuration, I'd like to understand better what problem you are
trying to solve before I can answer your question. When you say you set up
logging programmatically to save engineering time, what do you mean? Why would
you need to generate config files at runtime?
> log4j2 2.2 made breaking changes to public classes
> --------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LOG4J2-978
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-978
> Project: Log4j 2
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.2
> Reporter: Daniel Norberg
>
> The log4j2 2.2 release contained breaking changes to public classes, breaking
> direct uses and extenders of log4j2 interfaces.
> E.g.
> https://github.com/apache/logging-log4j2/commit/3cdbbeddf19137d20fa6527d6620e88afcecb7f9
> Here is an example of the impact of this breaking change:
> https://github.com/spotify/logging-java/commit/3d2ca1c31a8ca3eabe1db378e2df48e0757e80e7
> Does log4j2 aim to follow semantic versioning? I am currently looking into
> the feasibility of taking log4j2 into use instead of logback, but this will
> not be possible if log4j2 will be having further breaking changes in minor
> releases.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
