https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51047
--- Comment #16 from Gary Gregory <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Jess Holle from comment #13) > (In reply to Gary Gregory from comment #12) > > You patch uses Java 5 and Log4j 1 is on Java 1.4, so that's a no go anyway > > :-( > > I've long since given up and been building and relying upon my own patched > log4j 1.2.17 that addresses many such issues by requiring Java 6 and > eschewing absolute compatibility with log4j extensions. > > There's lot of simple tricks, e.g. using a CopyOnWriteArrayList for the > appenders, hoisting layout formatting out of the sync block on an opt-in > basis, etc. > > Yes, log4j 2.x is now out and I should probably look at it more. That said, > when you have a lot of custom log4j 1.x appenders and layouts and loads of > code log4j 1.2 and a sizeable portion of it using API's beyond the "simple" > set, this is a non-trivial undertaking. Getting better performance out of > 1.2.x until one has time for that undertaking only makes sense. I hear you. I have a big work project that is deeply intertwined in log4jj 1.2 and it's quite likely to stay there... For new projects we use v2. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
