You mean we will use the maven.compile.* properties to compile with java7, and use some different mechanism (not sure what) to create the javadoc with java8? That would work for me.
On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Yes, we need to be careful: if we compile with java8 the class version >> will be such that a java 7 JRE will refuse to load our jar ("Incompatible >> class version"). >> > > No, it will not. We define the maven.compile.* properties to deal with > that. > > Gary > > >> I also like the java8 Javadoc though. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 2015/06/30, at 8:38, Ralph Goers <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> That would be the site build. I always build the artifacts with the idk >> we are targeting just to be safe. >> >> Ralph >> >> On Jun 29, 2015, at 4:24 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Mostly to RG: Any thoughts on building with Java 8 to get the nicer >> looking Javadocs? >> >> Gary >> >> -- >> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] >> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> >> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> >> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> >> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com >> Home: http://garygregory.com/ >> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >> >> >> > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory >
