That’s not are reason to redo a release candidate, especially since I think 
that bug has been around a while.

As a reminder, your vote means that you have downloaded and inspected the 
release candidate and didn’t find any defects that are showstoppers, both in 
terms of operation and packaging. So something like a severe performance 
degradation, binary compatibility breakage, missing license headers, artifacts 
that are improperly signed, etc are all reasons to vote -1 on a release.

Ralph


> On Oct 11, 2015, at 4:11 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> It's a rather minor change that would fix a bug marked critical, so it could 
> be worth redoing the RC. I'll make a vote on that.
> 
> On 11 October 2015 at 17:30, Ralph Goers <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Also, your vote is still binding so if you want to review and vote on the 
> release you can. That said, I understand if you want to take some time and 
> get acquainted with the code again.
> 
> Ralph
> 
>> On Oct 11, 2015, at 3:28 PM, Ralph Goers <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> No nothing has really changed. I have a branch I am waiting to commit to 
>> master since I don’t want it included if I have to create another release 
>> candidate. That wouldn’t be a problem for simple bug fixes.
>> 
>> Ralph
>> 
>>> On Oct 11, 2015, at 3:03 PM, Matt Sicker <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Has anything changed in regard to branching since I last contributed? I 
>>> pushed a commit to master to fix a bug, but I forgot to make sure that was 
>>> still the right way to do things (especially with an RC going on).
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Matt Sicker <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>

Reply via email to