Looks like it could be handy. On 26 October 2015 at 12:29, Gary Gregory <garydgreg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I keep on hearing that Scala suffers from a lot compatibility issues from > version to version. Would is make sense to tag on a version to the module > to account for this, like log4j-scala-2.11.7? > > Gary > > On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Mikael Ståldal < > mikael.stal...@magine.com> wrote: > >> I am thinking of making a log4j module, "log4j-scala", with a Scala >> wrapper for Log4j 2, inspired from >> https://github.com/typesafehub/scala-logging >> >> Would that make sense? >> >> -- >> [image: MagineTV] >> >> *Mikael Ståldal* >> Senior software developer >> >> *Magine TV* >> mikael.stal...@magine.com >> Regeringsgatan 25 | 111 53 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com >> >> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this >> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message >> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may >> not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, >> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply >> email. >> > > > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > -- Matt Sicker <boa...@gmail.com>
