Which one should we keep? On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:24 AM, Mikael Ståldal <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> We have some redundancy in the documentation, the same dependencies for >> log4j-core are in these two places: >> >> http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/runtime-dependencies.html >> http://logging.apache.org/log4j/2.x/log4j-core/index.html >> >> I suggest we remove one of them. It's hard enough to keep them up-to-date >> anyway. >> > > Agreed, go for it. > > Gary > > > >> >> -- >> [image: MagineTV] >> >> *Mikael Ståldal* >> Senior software developer >> >> *Magine TV* >> [email protected] >> Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com >> >> Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this >> message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message >> (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may >> not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, >> you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply >> email. >> > > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > -- [image: MagineTV] *Mikael Ståldal* Senior software developer *Magine TV* [email protected] Grev Turegatan 3 | 114 46 Stockholm, Sweden | www.magine.com Privileged and/or Confidential Information may be contained in this message. If you are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such a person), you may not copy or deliver this message to anyone. In such case, you should destroy this message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.
