I’m not sure if that was a question for me, but I don’t understand the last part of the sentence “and calls that last successful artifacts”.
Ralph > On Nov 28, 2015, at 11:00 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > Is it against any rules to have a job on builds.a.o that picks up the zip and > expands it and calls that last successful artifacts? > > -Alex > > From: Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com > <mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>> > Date: Saturday, November 28, 2015 at 4:27 PM > To: Log4J Developers List <log4j-dev@logging.apache.org > <mailto:log4j-dev@logging.apache.org>> > Cc: Apache Infrastructure <infrastruct...@apache.org > <mailto:infrastruct...@apache.org>> > Subject: Re: [NOTICE] people.apache.org web space is moving to home.apache.org > > Thanks Gavin. As I mentioned we have had a buildbot job that has been failing > for months. We ended up doing our CI builds on Jenkins and just ignore the > failure messages since we can’t seem to get them fixed. > > I also don’t see how buildbot can do what we want to do. Our current process > is to build the site from the release tag, zip it up and scp it to the > release managers account on people.apache.org <http://people.apache.org/> > where it is unzipped into their web space. The site is then reviewed along > with the source and binaries as part of the release process. I’d prefer it > if a process could be put in place to allow us to do this on home.apache.org > <http://home.apache.org/>, but should that not be possible we will make due > with the project VM we have requested. > > Ralph > >> On Nov 28, 2015, at 4:49 PM, Gavin McDonald <gmcdon...@apache.org >> <mailto:gmcdon...@apache.org>> wrote: >> >> Ralph et al >> >> (As I mentioned on your INFRA jira ticket…) >> >> Some projects opt to use https://ci.apache.org/projects/ >> <https://ci.apache.org/projects/> to host RC/Snapshot websites. >> This is done via Buildbot and a config file is all that needs to be >> maintained. >> >> Examples: >> >> https://ci.apache.org/projects/asterixdb/index.html >> <https://ci.apache.org/projects/asterixdb/index.html> >> https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-0.10/index.html >> <https://ci.apache.org/projects/flink/flink-docs-release-0.10/index.html> >> https://ci.apache.org/projects/tomcat/tomcat8/docs/index.html >> <https://ci.apache.org/projects/tomcat/tomcat8/docs/index.html> >> >> Projects are also welcome to stage API and code coverage docs there too:- >> >> https://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/apidocs/8.x/index.html >> <https://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/apidocs/8.x/index.html> >> https://ci.apache.org/projects/cayenne/api/index.html >> <https://ci.apache.org/projects/cayenne/api/index.html> >> https://ci.apache.org/projects/tomcat/tomcat8/coverage/coverage/index.html >> <https://ci.apache.org/projects/tomcat/tomcat8/coverage/coverage/index.html> >> >> And finally, projects are welcome to host alpha/beta/snapshot/nightly >> developer only previews of their software releases:- >> >> https://ci.apache.org/projects/subversion/nightlies/index.html >> <https://ci.apache.org/projects/subversion/nightlies/index.html> >> https://ci.apache.org/projects/jmeter/nightlies/index.html >> <https://ci.apache.org/projects/jmeter/nightlies/index.html> >> https://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/snapshots/index.html >> <https://ci.apache.org/projects/ofbiz/snapshots/index.html> >> >> File an INFRA jira ticket if interested and I’ll gladly help set something >> up. >> >> Gav… >> >> >>> On 27 Nov 2015, at 6:00 am, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com >>> <mailto:ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>> wrote: >>> >>> When performing releases we typically create a new web site for our project >>> on our local machine, zip it up and then unzip it on p.a.o for reviewers to >>> look at during voting on the release. The site is way too big to try to do >>> file by file with sftp. How will we be able to accomplish this with the new >>> plan? >>> >>> Ralph >>> >>>> On Nov 25, 2015, at 5:20 AM, Daniel Gruno <humbed...@apache.org >>>> <mailto:humbed...@apache.org>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi folks, >>>> as the subject says, people.apache.org <http://people.apache.org/> is >>>> being decommissioned soon, and >>>> personal web space is being moved to a new home, aptly named >>>> home.apache.org <http://home.apache.org/> ( https://home.apache.org/ >>>> <https://home.apache.org/> ) >>>> >>>> IMPORTANT: >>>> If you have things on people.apache.org <http://people.apache.org/> that >>>> you would like to retain, >>>> please make a copy of it and move it to home.apache.org >>>> <http://home.apache.org/>. (note, you will >>>> have to make a folder called 'public_html' there, for items to show up >>>> under https://home.apache.org/~yourID/ <https://home.apache.org/~yourID/> >>>> ). >>>> >>>> We will _NOT_ be moving your data for you. There is simply too much old >>>> junk data on minotaur (the current people.apache.org >>>> <http://people.apache.org/> machine) for it to >>>> make sense to rsync it across, so we have made the decision that moving >>>> data is up to each individual committer. >>>> >>>> The new host, home.apache.org <http://home.apache.org/>, will ONLY be for >>>> web space, you will not >>>> have shell access to the machine (but you can copy data to it using SFTP >>>> and your SSH key). Access to modify LDAP records (for project chairs) >>>> will be moved to a separate host when the time comes. >>>> >>>> There will be a 3 month grace period to move your data across. After >>>> this time span (March 1st, 2016), minotaur will no longer serve up >>>> personal web space, and visits to people.apache.org >>>> <http://people.apache.org/> will be redirected >>>> to home.apache.org <http://home.apache.org/>. >>>> >>>> With regards, >>>> Daniel on behalf of the Apache Infrastructure Team. >>>> >>>> PS: All replies to this should go to infrastruct...@apache.org >>>> <mailto:infrastruct...@apache.org> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >