The whole point here is to provide a jar...

Gary

On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Paul Benedict <[email protected]>
wrote:

> You can also achieve the same thing by creating a "fat POM" that lists all
> the dependencies (or the ones you're interested in). My point is you don't
> have to build another jar; you can achieve this by building another POM.
>
> Cheers,
> Paul
>
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> To the point of conveniences, the convenience is GREAT when I use
>> cxf-bundle, hamcrest-all, activemq-all, jetty-all, mockito-all, and so on,
>> instead of being forced to list out 50 or who-knows-how-many modules. For
>> our big app server, I just use bundles and be done with it unless a
>> specific dependency problem arises.
>>
>> Gary
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 10, 2015 at 10:28 AM, Ralph Goers <[email protected]
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> My understanding is that most of the people who combine jars like this
>>> also include the classes from their application. For that reason I don’t
>>> think it would be helpful.
>>>
>>> Beyond that, I am not sure combining them makes it “super-convenient”.
>>> The only place this might be helpful is in OSGi, and even then I am not
>>> sure as I don’t really know enough about OSGi. Also, we need to look at the
>>> new module system in Java 9.
>>>
>>> Ralph
>>>
>>>
>>> On Dec 10, 2015, at 11:13 AM, Matt Sicker <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Most projects where I use log4j2, I include all the following
>>> dependencies thanks to framework logging divergence:
>>>
>>> log4j-api
>>> log4j-core
>>> log4j-jcl
>>> log4j-jul
>>> log4j-slf4j-impl
>>> log4j-1.2-api
>>>
>>> Shading these together would be super-convenient. Would anyone else be
>>> interested in such a thing? I usually see this sort of thing in testing
>>> frameworks (like mockito-all, hamcrest-all, etc.), but calling this
>>> log4j-all would be incorrect.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matt Sicker <[email protected]>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
>> Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
>> <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
>> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
>> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
>> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
>> Home: http://garygregory.com/
>> Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
>>
>
>


-- 
E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected]
Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition
<http://www.manning.com/bauer3/>
JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/>
Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/>
Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com
Home: http://garygregory.com/
Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory

Reply via email to