I am fine with it. I can upgrade it to current release of log4j.

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Ralph Goers <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
wrote:

> Then why do you need a patch for 2.2?
>
> Ralph
>
> On Jan 13, 2016, at 8:55 PM, sampath kumar <sampath...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> We are using Java 8
>
> Regards,
> Sampath Kumar
> Sent from Mymobile
> On Jan 13, 2016 10:33 PM, "Ralph Goers" <ralph.go...@dslextreme.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I assume this is because you are using Java 6?  If so any updates we do
>> would most likely occur as a patch to 2.3.  However, most of us are pretty
>> overwhelmed with our day jobs so we would probably need some help to do
>> that.
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>> On Jan 13, 2016, at 9:48 AM, sampath kumar <sampath...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Can this patch back ported log4j 2.2 ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Sampath Kumar
>> On Jan 13, 2016 10:08 PM, "Ralph Goers (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>     [
>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1221?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15096496#comment-15096496
>>> ]
>>>
>>> Ralph Goers commented on LOG4J2-1221:
>>> -------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Michael, if there are other issues you would like to submit patches for
>>> please know we greatly appreciate the help!
>>>
>>> > Dead lock observed in BlockingWaitStrategy in Log 4J
>>> > ----------------------------------------------------
>>> >
>>> >                 Key: LOG4J2-1221
>>> >                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1221
>>> >             Project: Log4j 2
>>> >          Issue Type: Bug
>>> >          Components: Core
>>> >    Affects Versions: 2.2
>>> >         Environment: log4J Version : 2.2 Disruptor Version : 3.3.2
>>> > Ring Buffer Size : 128
>>> > OS Version :
>>> > cat /etc/release
>>> > Oracle Solaris 11.2 X86
>>> > Java Version
>>> > java version "1.7.0_45"
>>> > Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_45-b18)
>>> > Java HotSpot(TM) Server VM (build 24.45-b08, mixed mode)
>>> >            Reporter: Sampath Kumar
>>> >            Priority: Critical
>>> >              Labels: patch
>>> >             Fix For: 2.5.1
>>> >
>>> >         Attachments: log4j2-test.xml, timeout_wait_strategy.patch,
>>> timeout_wait_strategy2.patch
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > We have seen this behavior in during high load. Where Logging Got
>>> Stropped and Application Went to not responsive state.
>>> > log4J Version : 2.2 Disruptor Version : 3.3.2
>>> > Ring Buffer Size : 128
>>> > Producer(Multiples Threads) and Consumer Threads(Single Thread As per
>>> Log 4J Configuration) Started Waiting on each other.
>>> > Here is the one of the Trace from Thread Dump:
>>> > Producer :
>>> > "[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '7' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default
>>> (self-tuning)'" TIMED_WAITING
>>> > sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>>> > java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(LockSupport.java:349)
>>> >
>>> com.lmax.disruptor.MultiProducerSequencer.next(MultiProducerSequencer.java:136)
>>> >
>>> com.lmax.disruptor.MultiProducerSequencer.next(MultiProducerSequencer.java:105)
>>> > com.lmax.disruptor.RingBuffer.publishEvent(RingBuffer.java:444)
>>> > com.lmax.disruptor.dsl.Disruptor.publishEvent(Disruptor.java:256)
>>> >
>>> org.apache.logging.log4j.core.async.AsyncLogger.logMessage(AsyncLogger.java:285)
>>> >
>>> org.apache.logging.log4j.spi.AbstractLogger.logMessage(AbstractLogger.java:722)
>>> >
>>> org.apache.logging.log4j.spi.AbstractLogger.logIfEnabled(AbstractLogger.java:693)
>>> > org.apache.logging.log4j.jcl.Log4jLog.debug(Log4jLog.java:81)
>>> > Consumer Thread :
>>> > "AsyncLogger-1" waiting for lock
>>> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject@5d972983
>>> WAITING
>>> > sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method)
>>> > java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:186)
>>> >
>>> java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:2043)
>>> >
>>> com.lmax.disruptor.BlockingWaitStrategy.waitFor(BlockingWaitStrategy.java:45)
>>> >
>>> com.lmax.disruptor.ProcessingSequenceBarrier.waitFor(ProcessingSequenceBarrier.java:55)
>>> >
>>> com.lmax.disruptor.BatchEventProcessor.run(BatchEventProcessor.java:123)
>>> >
>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1145)
>>> >
>>> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:615)
>>> > java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:744)
>>> > Is this is known issue which got already fixed in recent build ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
>>> (v6.3.4#6332)
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-dev-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-dev-h...@logging.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
>


-- 
Regards,
Sampath

Reply via email to