[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1290?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15156528#comment-15156528
 ] 

Gary Gregory commented on LOG4J2-1290:
--------------------------------------

Well, OK, but that is not a trivial task. I'm all for a NettySocketAppender but 
I think we should keep SocketAppender around for behavioral compatibility, 
warts and all. 

What to do when a timeout occurs still needs to be defined, Netty or otherwise.

> Add SoTimeout value config support when use SocketAppender
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: LOG4J2-1290
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-1290
>             Project: Log4j 2
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>            Reporter: zhaoyufei
>              Labels: SocketAppender
>   Original Estimate: 1h
>  Remaining Estimate: 1h
>
> Currently, when i use SocketAppdnder,  for timeout related parameters, 
> only connectTimeout is support.
> but i think it is better to make SoTimeout support also.
> If socket target server is busy some time,  then socketAppender will take 
> long time to wait for target's response, this can somehow slow client 
> application speed.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to