And I imagine that _moving_ Layout is too much of a BC break even though it is in Core?
Gary On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Gary Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > IMO, the oddness is that Layout is NOT in the layout package. So I would > leave all layout items in layout... > > Gary > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:00 AM, Remko Popma <[email protected]> wrote: > >> What package should the Encoder and ByteBufferDestination interfaces live >> in? >> >> Currently they are both in org.apache.logging.log4j.core.layout, but >> o.a.l.l.core.Layout extends Encoder and it seems a bit strange to have >> Layout's super interface live in a subpackage. >> >> I think there are pros and cons to leaving them in the layout package or >> pulling them up to the core package, but I'd be interested to hear >> everyone's feedback. >> >> Remko >> > > > > -- > E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition > <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> > JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> > Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> > Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com > Home: http://garygregory.com/ > Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory > -- E-Mail: [email protected] | [email protected] Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/bauer3/> JUnit in Action, Second Edition <http://www.manning.com/tahchiev/> Spring Batch in Action <http://www.manning.com/templier/> Blog: http://garygregory.wordpress.com Home: http://garygregory.com/ Tweet! http://twitter.com/GaryGregory
